The 2012 Hormone Therapy Position Statement of The North American Menopause Society (NAMS) updates the evidence-based position statement published by NAMS in 2010 regarding recommendations for hormone therapy for postmenopausal women.
The 2012 Hormone Therapy Position Statement of The North American Menopause Society (NAMS) updates the evidence-based position statement published by NAMS in 2010 regarding recommendations for hormone therapy (HT) for postmenopausal women.
The updated position statement further distinguishes the emerging differences in the therapeutic benefit-risk ratio between estrogen therapy (ET) and combined estrogen-progestogen therapy (EPT) at various ages and time intervals since menopause onset.
The statement was published in the March 2012 issue of Menopause: The Journal of The North American Menopause Society. Highlights of the specific recommendations include:
The most effective treatment for menopausal vasomotor symptoms and associated quality of life is ET or EPT. Among healthy women younger than 60 years or within 10 years of menopause, neither ET nor EPT use is associated with increased risk for cardiovascular disease. Although stroke risk may be increased, it is still a rare occurrence among women younger than 60 years. Compared with ET, EPT is associated with a higher risk for coronary artery disease, and potentially of ovarian cancer, than ET.
Recommended duration of therapy differs for EPT in women with a uterus and for ET in women who have had a hysterectomy. NAMS recommends EPT for relief of hot flashes in women with a uterus, so that the progestogen component will protect the uterine lining from the carcinogenic effects of estrogen alone.
Heightened risk for breast cancer associated with more than 3 to 5 years of EPT use limits the duration of safe EPT use. For ET, the benefit-risk profile is more favorable. Because risk for breast cancer does not appear to increase during an average of 7 years of ET use, there is more flexibility in duration of ET treatment.
The decision to use HT should still be individualized and patient-specific, based on the patient’s priorities regarding health and quality of life, as well as on specific risk factors for thrombosis, cardiovascular disease, stroke, and breast cancer.
Safety data are lacking to support HT use in breast cancer survivors. Women with premature or early menopause and no contraindications to HT may use HT until age 51 years, which is the average age of natural menopause, or longer if needed to control symptoms.
HT use is associated with a lower fracture risk, but a higher risk for ischemic stroke, venous thromboembolism, and ovarian cancer.
Coalition promotes important acetaminophen dosing reminders
November 18th 2014It may come as a surprise that each year Americans catch approximately 1 billion colds, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimates that as many as 20% get the flu. This cold and flu season, 7 in 10 patients will reach for an over-the-counter (OTC) medicine to treat their coughs, stuffy noses, and sniffles. It’s an important time of the year to remind patients to double check their medicine labels so they don’t double up on medicines containing acetaminophen.
Support consumer access to specialty medications through value-based insurance design
June 30th 2014The driving force behind consumer cost-sharing provisions for specialty medications is the acquisition cost and not clinical value. This appears to be true for almost all public and private health plans, says a new report from researchers at the University of Michigan Center for Value-Based Insurance Design (V-BID Center) and the National Pharmaceutical Council (NPC).
Management of antipsychotic medication polypharmacy
June 13th 2013Within our healthcare-driven society, the increase in the identification and diagnosis of mental illnesses has led to a proportional increase in the prescribing of psychotropic medications. The prevalence of mental illnesses and subsequent treatment approaches may employ monotherapy as first-line treatment, but in many cases the use of combination of therapy can occur, leading to polypharmacy.1 Polypharmacy can be defined in several ways but it generally recognized as the use of multiple medications by one patient and the most common definition is the concurrent use of five more medications. The presence of polyharmacy has the potential to contribute to non-compliance, drug-drug interactions, medication errors, adverse events, or poor quality of life.
Medical innovation improves outcomes
June 12th 2013I have been diagnosed with stage 4 cancer of the pancreas, a disease that’s long been considered not just incurable, but almost impossible to treat-a recalcitrant disease that some practitioners feel has given oncology a bad name. I was told my life would be measured in weeks.