National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute-sponsored cardiovascular trials often enroll a "substantial" proportion of international participants.
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)- sponsored cardiovascular (CV) trials often enroll a "substantial" proportion of international participants, according to a new analysis published recently in the Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
"The decreased US participation in NHLBI CV trials is cause for concern," the investigators stressed in their paper. They continued on to caution how increased international participation in such clinical trials could result in poorer generalizability (external validity) of the trials' results to US patients and decrease US prescriber acceptance of the research findings.
For their analysis, investigators searched the National Institutes of Health's (NIH) registry of clinical trials to identify randomized phase 3 or phase 4 CV trials funded by the NHLBI between 1997 and 2009. They identified a total of 24 studies, 19 (79%) of which included international participants (total number of international participants in these trials was 151,682 or ~15% of all participants). The median proportion of international enrollment in all trials was 9.5%, but exceeded three-quarters of patients in 4 trials. Of note, high-risk CV trials and trials testing acute interventions tended to have higher rates of international participation, with coronary artery disease trials (n=11 studies) having a median international participant enrollment rate of about 50% compared to 0.3% to 15.8% in the other CV trials.
IMPACT ON PATIENT CARE
The investigators noted, "The results of these studies profoundly influence patient care both in the United States and worldwide and universally result in Class 1 recommendations in the American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association treatment guidelines."
NHLBI-sponsored trials that have enrolled international participants are likely familiar to most, and include such influential trials as ALLHAT (for hypertension), AFFIRM (for atrial fibrillation), ACCORD (diabetes), PEACE (stable coronary artery disease), and SCD-HeFT (internal cardioverter defibrillators). Each of the trials was published in a respected medical journal including NEJM, JAMA, Lancet, Circulation, or JACC.
"Given questions of applicability and ethical and financial considerations, international participation in US clinical trials deserves further scrutiny," concluded the investigators.
SOURCE
Kim ESH, Carrigan TP, Menon VM. International participation in cardiovascular randomized controlled trials sponsored by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011; 58:671–676.
Coalition promotes important acetaminophen dosing reminders
November 18th 2014It may come as a surprise that each year Americans catch approximately 1 billion colds, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimates that as many as 20% get the flu. This cold and flu season, 7 in 10 patients will reach for an over-the-counter (OTC) medicine to treat their coughs, stuffy noses, and sniffles. It’s an important time of the year to remind patients to double check their medicine labels so they don’t double up on medicines containing acetaminophen.
Support consumer access to specialty medications through value-based insurance design
June 30th 2014The driving force behind consumer cost-sharing provisions for specialty medications is the acquisition cost and not clinical value. This appears to be true for almost all public and private health plans, says a new report from researchers at the University of Michigan Center for Value-Based Insurance Design (V-BID Center) and the National Pharmaceutical Council (NPC).
Management of antipsychotic medication polypharmacy
June 13th 2013Within our healthcare-driven society, the increase in the identification and diagnosis of mental illnesses has led to a proportional increase in the prescribing of psychotropic medications. The prevalence of mental illnesses and subsequent treatment approaches may employ monotherapy as first-line treatment, but in many cases the use of combination of therapy can occur, leading to polypharmacy.1 Polypharmacy can be defined in several ways but it generally recognized as the use of multiple medications by one patient and the most common definition is the concurrent use of five more medications. The presence of polyharmacy has the potential to contribute to non-compliance, drug-drug interactions, medication errors, adverse events, or poor quality of life.
Medical innovation improves outcomes
June 12th 2013I have been diagnosed with stage 4 cancer of the pancreas, a disease that’s long been considered not just incurable, but almost impossible to treat-a recalcitrant disease that some practitioners feel has given oncology a bad name. I was told my life would be measured in weeks.